So you’re able to compare all of our second hypothesis, we earliest recoded, for each and every of the things that to your position measure, brand new percentage of responses one to show in the event that husbands have less, equivalent or higher results, particularly, reputation, with hypogamy, and thus husbands has actually all the way down position than just wives, homogamy, meaning equal standing, and hypergamy, definition husbands having high updates than spouses. Towards possible connection regarding nation, analyses had been significant for the studies (X dos =11.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and financial feeling out of a possible split up (X dos =9.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Analysis revealed that, to have Foreign language professionals, there was so much more training hypogamy, while getting Dominican participants there can be so much more training homogamy. Towards economic points in case of divorce case, because there is alot more homogamy to own Foreign language people, there clearly was more hypergamy to own Dominicans (find Profile 1).
Which have prior marriages or perhaps not was not related so you’re able to differences in condition. Regarding the prospective connection ranging from reputation and you may years partnered, extreme connectivity was included in fitness (X dos =14.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and while to own couples y is out there (forty.4%, each), to have people y prevails (43.4%). This means www.datingranking.net/it/siti-di-incontri-mediorientali, toward group with additional age partnered, husbands features down fitness updates. Having people regarding previous failed marriages and achieving students off most recent matrimony did not somewhat connect with reputation.
Within the share, the newest analyses regarding second hypothesis indicated that contrary to the traditional, the greatest element relevant to help you updates ‘s the nation.
Univariate tests revealed significant variations in factor 1 (F=5
To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).
Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.
In the end, hypogamy facts in The country of spain obtained rather below hypogamy products within the Dominican Republic
Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.
Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).